Category: HWS Events

  • Crime writer, Andrew Taylor speaks at the Hampshire Writers’ Society

    Report by Carole Hastings 

    Barbara Large welcomed members and guests to the start of the new season of exciting HWS talks with acclaimed authors Andrew Taylor as the main speaker and Lindsay Ashford as special guest and adjudicator for the September competition.

    Lindsay is an internationally published crime writer whose book The Mysterious Death of Miss Austen will be dramatised on Radio 4 in February 2014.LindsayAshford She shared her top tip for writer’s block. When she is developing her characters for a novel, she studies photos from papers and a plethora of magazines for people who have features that match those of her characters. She sticks these images on index cards creating a box of faces for each novel. When she’s stuck, she stares at a card and lets the face take on a life of its own. She lets any idea come into her head to unlock her creativity. The Gothic face of the antagonist in her book Where Death Lies came for a teen music magazine. The book is available from September on Kindle for 98p for a limited period only.

    Andrew Taylor, author of 40 crime novels, won the Creasey Dagger Award in 1982 with his first book Caroline Miniscule written whilst he worked in a library. It was the first in his eight book Dougal series and he hasn’t looked back.   He has won a number of awards including the prestigious Cartier Diamond Dagger in 2009 for his outstanding contribution to the genre. Most recently in 2013 he won the CWA Ellis Peter Historical Dagger for the third time, this time for The Scent of Death, which was set in Manhattan during the American War of Independence and explored the relativity of loyalty.

    Andrew TaylorAndrew writes organically with no defined plot or structure, just some fragments that he wants to feature. He likened it to having a packet of seeds but no idea of how the plant will look when it’s fully grown. He said when faced with writer’s block he forces himself to write, even if he’s not sure where it will go. He stressed the importance of creating a hook at the end of each chapter to keep attention high. His first novel developed into a crime novel but the intention at the outset was purely to write a page turning story that was authentic. His publishers made the point that crime is always popular so this would secure a place on the booksellers’ shelves which is more difficult for mainstream novels. However they asked him to edit it by a third, an act that he said felt like sawing off the legs of his first born, but one that he eventually saw made the book a success. He made the point that professional writers take advice that amateurs won’t…

    Crime fiction has had a renaissance over the past thirty years and the market has gone from simple “who dunnit’s” to complex psychological thrillers set in any time. Barbara Vine’s novels that explored moral dilemmas in the 90’s marked a turning point for the genre. The importance of a corpse and a real story that entertains the reader are of paramount importance to Andrew, as is thorough research rather than relying on memory for period fiction. He watches film, listens to music, reads the papers, checks social history records of any era he writes about. His Lydmouth series about a policeman and female journalist in the 1950’s was his first testament to that. There is a final book in the series waiting in the wings. Most of his work includes issues relevant to the day e.g. worries about the Cold War, social mores, class and sexism.

    As well as generating his work from scratch, he novelised the TV drama Bergerac on the invitation of Penguin and created four novels in eight months. Some years later The Roth Trilogy, three psychological thrillers inspired by Fred West, were televised as Fallen Angel and starred Charles Dance and Emilia Fox.

    Andrew advised everyone to keep their writing simple, not to over-complicate the plot and to avoid too many characters in too many settings.

    For more information on Andrew and his books see: http://www.andrew-taylor.co.uk

  • Gala Evening at Chawton with Julian Unthank

    Chawton HouseThere can be no better location for the finale of the HWS season than Chawton House and Library.  Stephen Lawrence, Chawton’s Chief Executive and author Lindsay Ashford, his partner, made us feel at home as we toured the house, ventured into the garden when the rain stopped and ate strawberries and cream in the courtyard and kitchen.

    June 2013 123 HWS Chairman, Barbara Large introduced the special guest, Professor Joy Carter, Vice Chancellor of the University of Winchester who praised Barbara for making the HWS and The Winchester Writers’ Conference the respected and successful organisations they are today.  She described her own role at the university as falling into three parts: a business woman, a diplomat and a politician.

    strawberries2

    Barbara reminded the audience that the HWS was borne out of a £2000 grant two years ago and then gave a creative synopsis of events that the HWS had enjoyed this second season.  The speakers that have given us pleasure and inspiration across the past ten months were:  PD James, Mark Morris, Nicolette Jones, Steve Tasane, Rosalinda Hardiman, Graham Hurley, James McConnachie, Jane Wenham-Jones, Christopher Reid, Julian Stannard and Madeleine Milburn.  She encouraged people to join the society before the end of June for £25 – this is less than £1 per hour for time spent listening and learning!

    June 2013 122Treasurer, Crispin Drummond assured the audience that the finances are in good shape and that a constitution will be circulated to members for comment and approval preceding an AGM in October

    Events Secretary, David Eadsforth introduced the superb guest speaker, screenwriter Julian Unthank who grabs our attention in Doc Martin, New Tricks, The Bill and various other TV dramas.  Julian started as an animal trainer for films, then went to film school with the intention of becoming a producer but then decided he’d prefer to write the scripts himself.  His first film was a short, Potemkin: The Runner’s Cut and had Charles Dance as the main character.

    Julian UnthankJulian also won numerous awards, including Raindance Film Festival, for his short film, Love at First Sight starring John Hurt and Phyllida Law.  He has used this film as his calling card in the increasingly competitive film world. Many experienced and good writers are finding it tough to get work as so much drama has been cut.  He cited the old TV soaps as the breeding ground for talent but these don’t exist today so even getting into the business is more difficult than it has ever been.

    Julian’s illuminating and energetic presentation, Hidden in Plain Sight – the Secret Structure of the Screen Story, made sure that we will never look at films or TV in the same way again…

    Using four distinctly different creative genres:  Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, Love at First Sight, The Apprentice and a 40 second Dulux commercial, Julian outlined his 17 beat structure that makes for a successful dramatic outcome.

    Act One [1/4 of the total length of feature]

    1          Opening image [generally an opposite image from the final one]

    2          Set up [approx 10 pages – can take up 50% of writing time]

    3          Controlling idea [character might state the theme e.g. Do you believe in love at first sight?]

    4          Inciting Incident [spurs movie on]

    5          Debate [moment of self doubt?]

    6          Turning Point

    Act Two [1/2 of the total length of feature]

    7          B story [contains controlling idea]

    8          Promise of Premise [trailer material – easiest to write]

    9          Mid point [the mood hangs on this]

    10        Things go wrong

    11        False defeat or victory

    12        Moment of Truth

    13        Turning Point 2 [creating more build up]

    Act Three [1/14 of total length feature]

    14        Finale

    15        Climax

    16        Resolution [often the main character usually has the last word]

    17        Final Shot [defines how the story has moved from the opening shot]

    Julian hung all four “dramas” onto this structure and we were amazed how accurately it worked.  He uses Final Draft software for script writing and encouraged everyone to write as visually as possible as so much film has less dialogue than it used to have.  He cited that in the UK drama tends to have 65% dialogue against 35% in the US. Shane Black is his favourite writer of action genre [Lethal Weapon, Iron Man 3, the Last Boy Scout]  and his recommended books are:

    How to Write a Movie in 21 days – Viki King

    The Writer’s Journey – Christopher Vogler

    Screenplay: the Foundations of Screenwriting – Syd Field

    Save the Cat – Blake Snyder

    Story – Robert McKee

    Teach Yourself Screenwriting – Ray Frensham

    The Screenwriter’s Bible – David Trotter

    Dr Gary Farnell led a resounding applause from the audience who had been privileged to hear the equivalent of a full day’s workshop condensed into an evening.

    Barbara wrapped up the evening by extending her thanks to everyone who had made the evening such a success.  She gave bouquets to Lindsay Ashford and Laura Hubner and was presented with one herself by Crispin Drummond for her constant and indefatigable efforts on the Society’s behalf.
    Report by Carole Hastings

    What our members say:

    “Dear Barbara, Thanks very much to you and your lovely team for another wonderful finale to Hampshire Writer’s Society’s second season. It is especially magical being in Chawton House with all its literary associations.

    We had a fun evening, melting in the atmosphere and enjoying a picnic and the tour.

    Obviously the highlight of the evening was Julian Unthank who was so enthusiastic and open about how to write a screenplay! Fantastic stuff! It almost makes one want to have a go!

    Many thanks again!”

    Joan Robinson-Harris

     

    “What a fabulous evening! And a cracking end to our second season. Julian’s talk/workshop/insight into being a scriptwriter was electrifying, and I shall certainly be reviewing everything I’ve written.

    Karin and Gary stole the show though, when they nearly brought the house down with Karin’s comedy sketch.

    Thoroughly enjoyable, all the best, Celia. “

     

    “…It was a memorably great evening and we all enjoyed it very much. One of my students, Jan won a prize for ‘Toggles’ which made the evening even more special. Thank you and all the committee for organising such a special evening and all for £2.50 or £5. Amazing!…”

    Hilary

  • Madeleine Milburn, literary agent, at the HWS

    report by Carole Hastings

    Chairman Barbara Large set the scene for an interesting evening. She congratulated Kirsty Whittle, winner of two competitions at the Winchester Writers’ Conference in 2011 and co-author of Journeys and What-not, for making it to the last eight in the Macmillan “Write Now” competition for Young Adult fiction. The winner’s book will be published later this year and is yet to be decided…

    Pippa from the West Meon Festival talked about their festival of books taking place July 11-14.  The have a workshop and a great line-up of speakers – Michael Morpurgo, Kate Mosse, Elizabeth Buchan, Jane Gardam and many others.  Checkwww.westmeonfestival.co.uk for details.

    Madelaine Clark publisher of the new New Writer Magazine explained how she and her partner Alison Glinn took over the magazine when the previous editor wanted to retire after 113 issues.  They have injected new life into it, extending the remit to attracting writing groups, developing it as a sister magazine to the their other publication New Books.  They gave everyone a copy and encouraged people to subscribe at a special price of £18 per year.  Check the newwriter.com and newbooksmag.com.

    Madeleine&Barabara (2)David Eadsforth introduced Madeleine Milburn of the eponymous literary agency who shared a thought provoking presentation.  Madeleine started her career at AP Watts 10years ago.  The agency is the oldest in the UK and represents highbrow writers such as Zadie Smith and Sebastian Barry who are less prolific than many of the more commercial authors she handled when she made the move to Darley Anderson.  Here Madeleine built her own list of authors in the female fiction, young adult and children’s genres.  These moved with her to her own agency and she works closely with all 25 of them and is branching into crime and thrillers.

    The digital age has seen a 66% increase in 2012 of books being read on e-readers amounting to £3.34 bn and just a small slippage on physical books of 1% £2.9 bn so overall more people are reading these days.

    Her advice to all writers is to try to get an agent before you consider self-publishing as although self-publishers have control of their book they have no advantages that a publisher brings such as editing, marketing, publicity, advance, editing costs, advance. Also low sales of a self published book may put off prospective agents.

    An agent will always fight your corner and give you editorial guidance whilst pitching, networking and negotiating rights in other media and overseas.  Publishers are interested in international best sellers and agents can facilitate this.  She recommended that all writers blog, tweet, network, constantly self promote and be prepared for editorial criticism.

    Madeleine looks for a hook, the most powerful voice, authentic characters, excellent dialogue, a good backstory with the minimum “telling”.  She expects a three chapter submission to be well presented with a one page synopsis covering who, when, what, where.  Titles need to make sense or be very different e.g. The Hunger Games, Before I Go to Sleep, Lovely Bones etc.  Full manuscripts should be available if requested.  She tends to get back to writers within a day or so, if she loves their writing, but receives 30-40 submissions a day.
    She encouraged writers to develop a pitch that sells their story by checking out back of book blurbs and testing pitches by tweeting to keep them succinct.  Distill a paragraph into sentence to help focus the pitch.  Think of a different angle to your book.  Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn is a no 1 best selling thriller with an unreliable narrator that holds a reader’s attention throughout.

    It is important to approach agents that you think is on your wavelength, so research is key – their websites, Facebook, bookseller, festivals etc will all help.  Send your work to 4-5 suitable agents at once.  Your covering letter needs to be positive and conversational with the aim to pitch your book by introducing yourself, saying why you think that agency is right for you.  Tell them what you are in the process of writing next.  All Madeleine’s writers produced stunning letters that accompanied unsolicited submissions!  Publishers need to know you have a book a year or at least every eighteen months in order to outlay advances and promotion funds.

    Currently short story anthologies aren’t selling well but some publishers are using their popular authors to write digital shorts to build their names in between novels.  Some booksellers will not sell short story collections at all.
    Key tips for successful agent catching:
    Join writing groups
    Attend festivals and book fairs

    Follow agents on social media

    Digest The Bookseller & Publishers Weekly

    Read writing magazines

    Go to writing retreats

    Read best selling books

    Study trends

    She advised that poetry needs to be pitched directly to publishers these days.
    The talk was exceptionally useful for anyone who seriously wants to be published.

  • An Evening with Christopher Reid and Julian Stannard

    Report by Carole Hastings

    Edward Fennel from the Hyde900 group was the special guest at this, the 8th event in our ten event programme. He invited everyone to join six The Art of Conversation discussion evenings starting on April 17 when visual artist Anna Cady is interviewed by Jenny Cuffe [File on Four – BBC Radio]. For details of programme and other Hyde 900 news.

    David Eadsforth introduced our main speakers: Christopher Reid poetry writer and publisher. He won the Costa Best Book of the Year 2009, the only poet to win this prize other than Seamus Heaney, for his anthology, A Scattering, a monument to his late wife Lucinda. Julian Stannard poet and tutor at the University of Winchester shared the platform.
    TwoPoets2

    We enjoyed a number of readings. The first from Julian were set in Genoa where he lived for some time and evoked the atmosphere, deftly slicing Italian into the English. They ranged from the birth of his son, walking around Genoa and a poem about a woman he no longer loves, The Parrots of the Villa Gruber Discover Lapis Lazuli, also the name of his anthology. We listened to lunches, walked along the Burlington Arcade and sympathised with his need for a cigarette alone in the mountains with just a dog for company.

    Christopher praised Julian for his comic and voluptuous spirit. He said generally his own poems were a versified, rather than a prosaic, response to grief, loss and unhappiness.A Scattering was written in three sections: the first whilst his wife was dying, the second after his wife’s death in a hospice and the final third, a widower’s dozen. He read Songbook, Dream and Afterlife and the audience were moved. He then read from his Nonsense anthology a piece about his character Professor Winterthorn – a man in search of some relief from his grief at a conference with an old student.

    Julian started writing poetry as a teenager and “didn’t grow out of it” and Christopher started at eight years old inspired by light verse in The Pick of Punch 1951. Both writers prefer verse and feel that it seizes you with excellence and surprise whilst novels often don’t. Poetry gives you something to hang onto that prose cannot provide.

    Christopher edits his poems as he writes and doesn’t revisit at a later date. When building an anthology he uses a yardstick of Ted Hughes [whose letters he has edited & published] which is the book needs to reach resolution and lead you to the last few poems. He does not tailor the poems themselves but uses this to determine what goes in and what order.

    Brian Evan-Jones commented that Julian seems to weave humour into his work with ease and asked if he found it easy to do. Christopher thought it was more to do with Julian’s picaresque view of the world. Julian thought it was odd as he described himself as “quite a miserable bugger”!

    Both poets found that publishing validated their work and Julian confessed that often he describes himself as a teacher rather than a poet as many people consider the arts as indulgent.

    As young writers they were heavily influenced by other poets. Christopher: Thomas, Sitwell, Stephens and Hopkins. Julian: TS Eliot – The Wasteland, Lowell – Life Studies and Hoffman’s Acrimony.

    Dr Gary Farnell lead everyone’s appreciation of a magical evening.

  • Jane Wenham-Jones speaks to Hampshire Writers’ Society

    Report by Carole Hastings

    Barbara Large opened the evening by inviting Local writing group, Pencils and What-not, to promote their new self-published book, Journeys and What-not. It’s a miscellany of sixty pieces of fiction, travel tales, poems and assorted writing. £1 per book will go to the charity First Story that supports creative writing in schools where at least 50% of the children are deprived. The book is available from P & G Wells in Winchester, The Winchester Discovery Centre and from their website.

    Then we heard from special guest Jenny Knowles who runs a small publishing company in the New Forest, called Little Knoll Press.

    Her mother wrote stories of her life in China and India and sent them to Jenny at boarding school rather than ordinary letters and these inspired Jenny to get into publishing. She has published some of her family’s stories and as well as a few others. She will soon be publishing a book of postcards accompanied by stories produced by a local artist. She thinks that people considering self-publishing use an external editor to get their work to a publishable standard. She recommended that people interested in travel writing join the Itinerant Writers Club via their website: http://www.lizcleere.com. It’s run by a woman called Liz Cleere from a boat near Cochin in India and provides a good support network.Jane Wenham-Jones (1)
    The main act was Jane Wenham-Jones and was pure entertainment. She recounted saying to one audience that it was easier to rob a bank that make money from writing. The audience were guests at HMP Send! This set the tone for the evening.

    She sees herself as a jobbing writer – novelist, short story writer, columnist, features writer, agony aunt, speaker. She’s feisty and tenacious and deals with her rejections by sending out another script the same day – often reworking a piece depending on the comments she may have had back. Her record for sending out the same piece was11 times across a period of two years. Her advice was to do something positive when you get a rejection – it’s normal to get plenty and few people really get their first novel published.

    She believes in writing what you know and her first novel Raising the Roofwas based on her experiences in the buy to let market where one of her tenants actually stole the boiler and another filled the place with stolen goods and replica guns. She tends to keep research to a minimum – mostly Google and asking people to tell what she needs to know. She’s a firm believer in not trying to sell your book until you’ve written it – the first three chapters are not enough. Keep your focus in what you want to write as you can easily pick up so much contradictory advice – bigger plot/bigger characterisation etc.

    IMG_1253Jane never wastes her life experiences – they all provide her with material for books and features -domestics even find their way into her column… Woman’s Weekly Fiction Specials are a great outlet for short stories.

    In the name of research Jane has been botoxed, [better performed by the dermatologist than the dentist apparently], been painted naked [her laptop strategically placed] and had a go at stand-up comedy. The audience found her funnier in real life than when she was trying to tell jokes.

    Her second book Perfect Alibis was based on research from a friend on how to have an affair which led her on to work on The Sun and an appearance on Kilroy. Her most recent novel,Prime Time, based on her experiences in day time TV was nominated for The Romantic Comedy of the Year Award.

    She currently has a 15,000 word book on Kindle called 100 ways to Fight the Flab and this will be out in paperback as a 60,000 word book by Christmas. She is running a “How to Lose Weight” competition for a week’s writing course in France.

  • James McConnachie: Writing to Order and When to Strain Against the Leash

    Report written by Gill Hollands.

    The evening began with three announcements. Barbara Large invited Nita Saini to talk about her pocket book which she has self-published after eight dark years of depression. She had discovered that current books on the subject were thick tomes offering no help. She felt that people who were depressed needed help to get themselves out of their situation and off drugs. While she was researching, her notes lived in her back pocket and determined the size for her new user-friendly book. She feels that her tips on de-stressing, happiness, relaxation and reducing anxiety will be relevant to every reader. The book has been endorsed by Stephen Fry, The Barefoot Doctor, Lorraine Kelly and MIND, who have recommended it to GPs. Nita said she wants to light up people’s lives. We are sure this will be a success and hope to hear more in the future. Check out the website on www.movingonupthebook.com.

    Alice Young’s new book, was recently published on Amazon. They provide an e-book, ISBN and allow you to set your price. It can then be turned into hardback if required. Alice belongs to a group of supportive undergraduate writers who gather frequently to help each other with various projects. This motivates them all to keep going. Congratulations to Alice.

    Joan McGavin, Faculty of Arts, announced a summer poetry course in Normandy on 24-28 June.

    Barbara Large gave the dates for the 33rd Winchester Writer’s Conference Festival and Bookfair, 21-23 June 2013 when Lord Julian Fellowes, author and script writer and renowned for the television series Downton Abbey, will give the Plenary Address. In-depth Writing Workshops are planned for Monday and Tuesday, 24 and 25 June, following the conference. Details will be available online soon.

    James McConnachie, professional reviewer, traveller, part time historian, 2008 Sunday Times Young Writer of the Year, writer for The Author, the quarterly journal of The Society of Authors and currently their temporary editor, gave an outstanding talk punctuated by many questions from the audience. He said that he felt honoured and delighted, yet daunted to be speaking to peers and fellow writers in his home town.

    Writing to Order and When To Strain Against the Leash

    He began by discussing his latest book, The Rough Guide to Conspiracy Theories. He has been a major contributor to Rough Guides since they began and believes deeply in their value to travellers. He often has to return to various countries to update the details in new editions. He stressed the importance of providing information which give access for the disabled. He felt that the books were very good value considering the time and energy he had committed to them. The books are aimed at an intelligent readership.

    He admitted that most of the conspiracy theories in his latest book attracted even the most sceptical writer. As a writer he strived to keep focussed on the topic. Most of the theories continue to be battlefields long after the event. His friend, Robin, who is a ‘rabid conspiracist’ helped him come up with the initial idea. He felt it was important to introduce humour and scepticism into dry facts, especially with tiptoe-ing into legal minefield. The risk of libel and defamation lost him many nights’ sleep; the potential for suing a constant nightmare. He explained in some length that the UK libel laws are an antiquated and complex maze which is under review currently. Even with proof of the facts, a court case could not be ruled out and reporting any facts from other sources is no defence. As a result, there were many decisions to be made when choosing which subjects could safely be covered in the book. He still feels some topics are on shaky ground. The agreed disclaimer at the beginning of the book ‘almost turns the whole thing into fiction’; that everything should be viewed with ‘complete disbelief’. In fact, he had wanted Terry Jones to write the introduction but he declined when he realised the potential risks.

    How long did it take to write the book? The first edition took 1½ years of solid work. The 2nd edition was more of an update and therefore only took months. The books cover 97 different subjects: the research was extensive.

    Do you shred everything? Every note and piece of paper used in his research is kept in case it is needed for defence. One possible claim involving the DEA and CIA came at the end of the first print run. Changes were to have been made before the next printing. Thankfully the threat came to nothing and the first run did not have to be withdrawn.

    Do the libel laws limit what and where you can publish? They do. He hates the restrictions.

    Could the problem not be shipped out to avoid UK law? The laws are about to change ‘libel tourism’. The law is currently ‘rotten’. A proper effort needs to be made to change it.

    Does this apply only to the written word? The law to prevent injustice is effective but writers should be able to speak the truth without being sued.

    What about the Official Secrets Act? He has not needed to sign this document. It does not apply to authors. It does apply to government workers in MI6: for example, in the case of Kelly’s death. The case is still open. James felt that he might come under pressure, but his book may sell 10-20,000 copies whereas newspapers sell millions.

    What about publishing on a foreign server? Could you still be sued under UK law? James was not certain.

    James said that he prefered non-fiction to fiction. He found the boundaries of being a guide book writer comforting, even liberating. He is humbly proud of being useful; being able to make a reader turn down a certain street; to change their experience of a place.

    He enjoys helping people, even being an ‘agony uncle’ for the Metro, the free London daily newspaper. When he responds to problems, he hopes that it will help other people with similar problems.

    James also reviews books for The Sunday Times. He is given the unusual books, those that don’t fit into a particular category or popular science, which he prefers. He admires the editor, also believing that book reviews should be simple, useful, fulfilling their duty to the reader. He read an excerpt that showed how he carefully balances his prose, reflecting and shaping matching words, a satisfying experience. He said writing is like boxing, use small punches and big swipes. He felt creativity has to be squeezed out in different ways. Even a book review gives the opportunity to write creatively. Non-fiction is becoming more interesting now; more creativity generates more energy.

    James referred to his book, The Rough Guide to Sex. He wanted to address all types of relationships, young, old, straight, gay; not assume the age-old stereotypes, which had limited other volumes.

    He struggled at first with the process, even thinking of basing it on a Rough Guide with a map. Eventually he began with attraction; love, desire, hormones, culture, beauty, sexuality, science and legality. These aspects reflect in many areas. He covered contraception, health and religion. He went on to bodies, including minds. Of course there is a chapter called ‘How to do it’. He addressed sex though life, through disability,(although he admitted that there were many aspects of this topic that require more thought), The book even discusses early changes in a young child’s brain toward love and affection. He mentioned that he also wrote about the dark side of sex and violence and its effects. Abuse is widespread and occurs in every culture. He feels very strongly against pornography.

    He also wrote about gay sex: no-one has covered this subject. To some it would seem shocking: in some societies, it would be illegal. Views vary with different cultures.

    Would this question even arise in 50 years? The norm varies widely in many cultures but society is constantly changing.

    James discussed TheBook of Love: the Story of the Kamasutra.

    His research into this topic began when James was given a special edition of The Kamasutra as a gift. He realised it was rather more like a book of conduct, a guide to Indian sexual relationships. He became obsessed by the attitudes to sex in the east and west and fascinated by the story of the original book which had to be translated by a friend.

    Finally James talked about The Society of Authors, a trade union for members who are very helpful to all writers. He works with no agent or accountant. Instead The Society of Authors have guided him. He has written various articles for their issues of The Author and he has been offered the post of temporary editor.To be on the other side of the fence was a new experience; accepting articles rather than pitching them. He welcomed letters to the editor.

    James does not used social media although he is on Twitter. While he feels it can be entertaining and the internet has its place, he feels that we should turn off the screen and read a book. His favourite authors are Rebecca Smith, a lecturer at the University of Southampton, Mick Jackson, Jonathan Buckley and Robert McFarlane. He admires his metaphors and ingenuity and the creative use of language.

  • Graham Hurley speaks to Hampshire Writers’ Society

    Brian Evans-Jones, Hampshire Poet Laureate, is our guest blogger this month.

    IT’S A STEAL: SOME THOUGHTS ON ‘FINDING YOURSELF’ AS A WRITER

    I spent an enjoyable and thought-provoking evening last night at the Hampshire Writers’ Society. I was invited as the warm-up act, giving a brief plug for the Writing Hampshireproject, which is going strong: over 100 poems now, and more coming in all the time. Next I hope we can get 200 poems, including more by kids, and more for poor old Basingstoke, which is badly under-represented at the moment! But the main pleasure of the evening was listening to the main speaker, crime writer Graham Hurley.

    Graham gives a mean lecture: energetic, funny, revealing. If you’re interested in becoming a full-time fiction writer, and you get the chance to listen to listen to him, you should. His talk told me a great deal about fiction publishing, and what it might take to succeed. But beyond that, his story also made me think about how we can all find our ways as writers: figuring out what kind of writer we want to be, and what we can be good at.

    Graham’s story started with a rejection, as so many do. In 1999, with a dozen or so standalone thrillers published, his publisher refused to take any more. Instead, they ‘asked’ him to try something new: a three-book Rebus-style crime series, set in his home city of Portsmouth.

    A decent opportunity on the face of it. But Graham hated, and still hates, crime fiction: he hadn’t read any then, and he doesn’t read any now. He was being asked to change his genre completely; rather like Faber offering me a contract on the condition than instead of poetry I send them a cookbook. Being 100% dependent on his income from publishing, he had to give it a go. And as you’ll have guessed by now, he succeeded; the series became 12 books long, sales have gone ever upwards, and there are popular adaptations on French TV (and possibly soon in the UK).

    So here’s my moral 1, and any writer who’s ever written a piece with constraints should recognise it: Be thankful for problems and limitations in your career, because your best results may come from them.

    How Graham responded to his new limitations is also revealing. He said he had two options. I think he had three. The first, which it’s clearly not in his personality to do, was to grumble and be bitter about this new twist in his life.

    Which leads me to moral 2:If you want to fail as a writer, be as bitter and resentful as you can, and focus as much as possible on the ‘if onlys’ of your career. I can’t think of a better way to ensure you’ll never get anywhere.

    To go back to the two options that Graham saw, they were: 1) To read every book of modern British crime fiction he could find, and then try to imitate them; or, 2) To start from scratch, and find his own way to write the genre. The first option comes straight from the advice that I have many times seen, and many times given: you’ve got to read what you want to write. But Graham hates crime fiction; so he chose not to. He has, in fact, become a complete exception to that ‘rule’: a proof that you don’t have to read what you want to write.

    (However, I want to make clear there are caveats: he was already an experienced and proficient writer of thrillers, so he knew the craft. And while he doesn’t read crime fiction, he has read a lot of good work, and still loves reading. You still can’t succeed as a writer without reading anything at all.)

    Instead, he took option 2; and here I think is the most interesting moral from his talk. He drew intelligently and profoundly on the kind of person he is, and the unique skills and experiences he’d acquired. He’d worked in TV as a journalist and documentary maker for 20 years; he was also, and therefore, in touch with every strand of life in Portsmouth. His TV experience had involved investigating in depth, and recording with fidelity, the lives of a wide range of people, so he did that again: he spent months shadowing Portsmouth police, getting to know police work and police officers with clarity and precision. Then when he wrote, he combined what he’d learned with what he knew about the city; and the combination worked. I’m making a selective interpretation there; there was a lot more to it than that, but Graham explains it better than I could (in his Kindle book ‘Backstory‘).

    Which leads to moral 3: To be a good writer, don’t try to do what others have done. Draw on what makes up you – your skills, interests, experiences – and chances are it will work.

    Not only will it work for readers: it will work for you as a writer. You’ll believe in it, and probably enjoy it.

    And here’s another benefit: it will make you stand out from other writers. Graham’s work stands out from other crime fiction in two ways: by being factually accurate in its portrayal of contemporary UK police work (so much so that Hampshire Constabulary started to invite Graham on special police operations, so he could use them in his work); and by dealing with wider concerns – the life of a whole city – than is usual than the genre.

    So here’s moral 4: being yourself can give your writing that ‘USP’ that publishers are so keen on.

    And that’ll do for now. He also said some things about the role of luck in a writer’s life, but I think that’s another post for another day.

     

    Happy New Year everyone.
    Brian Evans-Jones
    brian@brianevansjones.com
  • Celebration of Charles Dickens Evening

    Several Shades of Dickens – A Celebration of the Bi-Centenary of Charles Dickens’ Birth 

    Report by Carole Hastings
    Some characters spotted at the event.
    Miss Havisham, Little Dorrit, Quilp, Mrs and Mrs Micawber, Tiny Tim and Mrs Nickleby were amongst others at this final event of 2012…
     

     

    Dom KippinDom Kippin, the Literature Development Officer for Portsmouth opened the evening’s talks telling us about the events we’ve sadly missed in this bi-centenary year of Dickens birth and things to look forward for next year.  Dom is behind a number of initiatives including, Writers Hub, Portsmouth 2013 – Home of Great Writing and a  Bookfest every autumn for established and debut writers. http://www.portsmouthbookfest.co.uk

    Rosalinda Hardiman

    Rosalinda Hardiman, Curator of the Charles Dickens’ Birthplace Museum and Collections Manager of Portsmouth Museums revealed that the collection covers over a million items ranging from a flea to a pumping station.  They aim to have a number of exhibitions so that items from archive can be shown to the public at different times.  You can see the largest collection of Arthur Conan Doyle artefacts anywhere in the world at the Portsmouth City Museum.

    Rosalinda talked about how well Dickens balanced his books with happiness and sadness and good and evil, with many themes as relevant today as they were when he wrote them.

    His parents, John and Elizabeth Dickens moved to Portsmouth in 1809 as his father John was a clerk in the Navy Pay Office during the during the Napoleonic War.  At this time, prison hulks moored outside Portsmouth Harbour housed French prisoners of war, it took over seven hours by coach to London and the price of renting property in Portsmouth was double its peace time rates.  Frances Dickens was born in 1810 and Charles John Huffam Dickens was born on February 7 1812.  The family moved to Kent when Charles was two and Chatham and London became the major influences in his writing.  That said, he returned to Portsmouth to research Nicholas Nickleby in 1838 and paid a number of visits to carry out readings.  His last one being in 1866 which was a sell out.  Dickens could not find his birthplace and it did not come to light until 1903 when solicitors discovered the rent book of the property and it was sold to the Corporation for twice the market rate.  It opened as a museum in 1904.

    Steve TasaneSteve Tasane, Writer in Residence for Dickens 2012 and Performance Poet thrilled the audience with his 140 line ballad of The Old Curiosity Shop.  It was spellbinding and brilliantly performed without a single note.  We also enjoyed What the Dickens! and Bill Sikes’ Bull’s Eye.  Steve described Dickens  as the original pop performer with his works precursors to soaps and internet literature as he wrote in short instalments for mass consumption.


    The Old Curiosity Shop – Steve Tasane- YouTube

    He followed this up a passionate delivery of his excellent poem, Save the Libraries

    Steve Tasane – Save The Libraries – YouTube

    Steve has been sponsored by the Arts Council to write a novel called Blood Donors which will be published by Walker Books in their Undercover Range for teens/young adults in October 2013.

  • An Evening with Nicolette Jones

    Report by Celia Livesey

    The special guest speaker, Cllr Frank Pearson, the Mayor of Winchester, was accompanied by the Mayoress, Mrs Ann Pearson. The Mayor gave a fascinating talk on the history of Winchester. The office of Mayor of Winchester is one of the oldest mayoralties in England, dating back to the period when the city was the national capital. The current Mayor of Winchester, Cllr Frank Pearson is the 813th in the office. IMG_1216 (2)

    During his term as Mayor, Cllr Pearson’s chosen charities will be The Magic Wand Appeal for the RHCH, the Felix Fund-the bomb disposal charity and Bishop’s Waltham Community Responders. The theme of the chosen charities is ‘A helping hand’.

    After a tremendous opening of the new season in September with Baroness James and a terrific follow on with Marc Morris, historian and author in October, I knew it would be a difficult task to top the previous speakers. However, for November, I am delighted to report that the HWS have managed to pull off a ‘hat-trick’ with last night’s main speaker, Nicolette Jones, writer, journalist and broadcaster.

    Nicolette gave a brief outline of her early years, and how her love of art and books was very much shaped by her father. As Children’s Books Reviewer for the Sunday Times, author of The Plimsoll Sensation, and co-author of Blooming Books, as well as Children’s Books Consultant for the Louise Allen-Jones Agency, Nicolette said that sometimes ‘good books slip through the net’.  A photo of her study, heavily carpeted with wall to wall books, demonstrated the problems all too clearly.     

    IMG_1215 (2)The Plimsoll Sensation took ten years to research and write, but Nicolette said that the story of Samuel Plimsoll, British politician and social reformer, was such a wonderful story of human courage and determination that she had to write it. She went on to say that the story had everything – corruption, power struggles, politics and human misery, but the legacy of the ‘Plimsoll line’, (a line on a ship’s hull indicating the maximum safe draft), is something that all sailors today are grateful for.

    Nicolette’s popularity was such that the question and answer session was the longest on record. The evening ended with a book signing by Nicolette, and also a surprise ‘free’ books donation for everyone from Crispin Drummond of P& G Wells Book Shop in Winchester.

  • An Evening with Marc Morris – Tuesday 9th October

    On a wild and wet October evening, Hampshire Writers’ Society Chairman, Barbara Large introduced special guest Professor Liz Stuart Senior Pro Vice-Chancellor from the University of Winchester who began by welcoming the HWS to the university campus.

    She spoke about her role at the university and her work as a writer. Although one of the smallest universities in the country, only 7000 students, it has made the top ten in the Sunday Times’List of best universities and achieved first place in the country for student satisfaction on its creative writing courses.

    Prof Liz Stuart (2)As a theologian, Professor Stuart has written ten books, although much of her time now is spent dealing with academic matters within the university, writing policy documents, academic papers and reports. Once regarded as a radical theologian, one of the delights of her life is when she discovers her work has been the subject of a PhD thesis.

    This year marks the 20th anniversary of the publication of her book which was banned by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Ironically, it turned out to be one of her best sellers!
    Marc Morris, historian, author and broadcaster

    The Guest Speaker, Marc Morris was interviewed by Graeme Pick, who began by asking why there was such a long gap between Marc Morris’ books.
    Report by Hermione LaakeMarc Morris

    Marc’s response was that books take a long time. There was a brief discussion about hot housing, doing a book in 2-3 years. Generally Marc described the time taken to write his work as being around four years, with the first being commissioned in 2004 and then going on to be published in 2008 and the second being commissioned in 2008 and published this year.

    Graeme asked M. M how he goes about writing his books.

    Much of his research on Edward 1st came about through his thesis on the Earls of Norfolk in the 13thCentury BC. “Edward I conquered Wales had illegitimate children, tried to conquer Scotland and had one of the greatest reigns in British history. I thought that he was due a page turning biography. Someone needs to write a book about this — me.”

    M.M described the process of writing as reading other people’s books and a synthesis taking place. But because of the sheer volume of writing available trying to make these disparate texts synthesise didn’t work. Prior to The Norman Conquest, there was much documentation. After the revolution in 1200 the King ordered that copies of messages were kept. These have survived,  Consequently, there is more evidence than you could look at. “European historians look at English medieval history and are agog,”
    Graeme then asked, “How do you decide what to discard?”

    M.M.:“What makes the research process interesting, is when it doesn’t fit.  You get your story straight.  I would imagine this is the same with every story. Every book I read with that date in, I break it down by year: Jan, Feb, March, the date of whatever, then you discover mistakes,”

    He described the tag Narrative History as often thought of as a pejorative term. “Alternatively there is thematic history.. Social history gets in the way whereas narrative history gets the story going. There needs to be a balance between moving the story forward and conveying the story.”

    Graeme: “Do you end up in a different place to where you expected?”

    M.M: “You’ve got to. You might start with one set of preconception and end up somewhere else…..Edward improved somewhere in my estimation as I was writing the book.  You start off with a series of preconceptions you came with, the legend and the bona fide academic material then you end up somewhere questioning those orthodoxies.”

    Graeme: “How do you decide which stories are worth telling or retelling?”

    M described this as hard sell. It was all about selling the legend, “Have you seen Braveheart—?”

    Graeme: “How do you keep the narrative going while having to address the reader?”

    M.M: “Where are the breaks and where are the hooks where the chapter ends? Where are the cuts? From an academic point of view that would be cheap tricks. People want to keep reading your book; people want to know what happens next. The academic way is completely different. You assume people know all that already.”

    He  described this as a balance of keeping the tricks to himself but often not revealing them to the reader, although on some occasions, he said he kept them in.

    Graeme: “You seem to be interested in how big characters drive the story. Without these big characters show do you drive the story?”

    M.M “Harold dies and with him one of the most important people in history. You’ve lost your antagonist you’ve lost your protagonist.”

    He managed to “skip along from 1072 to 1085/6. I brought in a character connected with The Bayeux Tapestry.. I am interested in why these stories matter. How did this affect England, Englishness, how did this affect the language? How did this affect the culture?”

    G: “Are you trying to teach people things?”

    M.M: “It tells you something about the past society.—Who are the bad guys in the Norman conquest? I was surprised to discover that the Anglo Saxons did slavery in a big way, and the Normans didn’t do that. Harold was a great slave trader. A major cultural shift was brought about by the Normans; Chivalry (not killing your opponent) was a new thing. The Vikings didn’t do this. The English didn’t do it. These are big changes. These affect the way the English view their Celtic neighbours: These people are barbarians we need to conquer and civilise them

    “You work as a writer. What other work are you doing to make sure your work gets out there?”

    M.M: “I do articles for history magazines, tour for literary festival, I’ve just written an article on slavery.”
    G: “Is the Norman conquest a good thing?”

    M.M: “No I don’t think it was a good thing….You are considering a balancing testimony, not taking sides. Your main duty as an historian is to get it right. The historian is not a judge. You make the best case and say make up your own mind. This [discussion] was called putting a pulse into the past. That’s not what I do. [I’m asking]… how can I make these bones live? I’m trying to take the pulse of the past.”

    Marc Morris’s articles are being collected and published as an E-book next week.

    For further information on this Marc’s website